8/22/2023 0 Comments Fat32 sd card formatter reddit![]() ![]() (This answer is an expansion to my comment on this answer which talks about Journaling in NTFS.) I think this is the second biggest difference after "compatibility with other OSes".įrom a Recovery point of view NTFS appears to be better suited. If you don't use EFS (like almost everybody, ever) then obviously this doesn't apply. Edit see comment, apparently this isn't true in Win10. Any files you copy to it will then get decrypted automatically, on the fly. If you do this often, choose exFAT on the removable drive. If you forget to manually decrypt it, you won't be able to access it on the other machine. ![]() However, if you usually take files to machines that don't have the decryption certificates, there is no way to tell Windows to automatically decrypt a file when it's copied to an external disk. Then your files stay encrypted in transit, yet are transparently accessible on all authorized computers. This can be great, and this can also be incredibly annoying, depending on your use case.īasically, if you want to take your files to another computer that has all the same decryption certificates installed, choose NTFS on the removable drive. When you copy an encrypted file to another NTFS volume, it stays encrypted using the same key(s) the original was. Files are encrypted on the disk, but are automatically decrypted when you access them. One very important difference comes about if you use the EFS "Encrypted" attribute (EFS stands for Encrypting File System, which is not actually a file system, but rather a feature of NTFS). Of course, only if your definition of “ideal” allows software to be proprietary and not open source. exFAT’s smaller footprint/overhead makes it ideal for this purpose. NTFS on flash memory has been known to be inefficient for quite some time. However, exFAT should be a true competitor to NTFS on systems with limited processing power and memory. ![]() This is likely more aimed at digital video recorder type devices, home users get a licence to use it with Windows. The only drawbacks to exFAT are that Microsoft has not released it into the public, requiring that companies licence it for use on their devices. Some of the missing (and effectively useless or a waste for removable media) features include: In theory, exFAT does not have as much of the operational overhead of NTFS as it lacks many features that add complexity (and therefore processing time and disk latency) to the filesystems. What Microsoft developers have basically done is update the FAT32 file system to exFAT, moving from 32-bit addressing to 64-bit addressing, to offer an improved speed alternative over moving to NTFS at the same time making it possible to create, store or transfer huge files, files greater than 4GiB.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |